As the Red Sox consider the trade deadline, they must not ignore recent history - The Boston Globe (2025)

Related: Nine innings with the Red Sox, starting with the joy of watching Jarren Duran

They need to do more and show more between now and the trade deadline date of demarcation (July 30) to prove they’re worthy of the organization deviating from its carefully charted sustainability path, whether you approve of that path or not. (For the record, I don’t.)

Saying this season is different is feelings over facts.

Advertisement

It’s shocking how short memories are. Last year, the Sox were a season-best nine games above .500 on July 28 and 1½ games out of the third wild card. They finished last at 78-84 for a second straight season after former chief baseball officer Chaim Bloom dubbed the team underdogs, citing their less than 25 percent playoff odds, to justify effectively passing at the deadline.

Get 108 Stitches

Receive the Globe's best reporting and commentary on the Red Sox every weekday.

In 2022, the Sox were a season-high 11 games above .500 on June 26 and 10 games over on July 4 while in possession of the first wild card. That team sunk to 52-52 by the Aug. 2 trade deadline and went through a conflicted and convoluted deadline that saw them try to simultaneously add (Tommy Pham, Eric Hosmer, and Reese McGuire) and sell off (Christian Vazquez) while retaining pending free agents Xander Bogaerts, J.D. Martinez, and Nathan Eovaldi. They finished last in the American League East.

Surely, manager Alex Cora and others clamoring for August augmentation to the current club will claim that if baseball ops had been more aggressive the outcomes would’ve been different. Disagree. It was water finding its level.

Related: Minor league report: In rookie league, Franklin Arias’s bat is catching up to his glove

This year’s speed racer Red Sox, a breath of fresh air whooshing by on the basepaths, are motoring on an oval of adequacy in The Fenway 500. For most of the season, they struggled to escape the gravitational pull of mediocrity, hovering at or around .500. The Sox were 35-35 through their first 70 games before they unfurled a stretch in which they won eight of nine games to pull a season-high seven games over .500 (43-36) on June 24.

Advertisement

And folks started losing perspective. You want to base decisions on one appealing summer snapshot of the Sox where we caught their good side?

It’s shrewd for Cora, in the last year of his deal, to publicly politick for reinforcements. Going to bat for his players to put pressure on chief baseball officer Craig Breslow and ownership to commit to helping this team is the right thing to do in his role. That doesn’t mean it’s the right thing for the organization.

It’s overkill from folks such as esteemed national baseball writer Ken Rosenthal to imply that the Sox are “obligated” to help this current collection of talent and pronounce that if ownership, led by John Henry (who also own the Globe) doesn’t “honor what their players and their manager have done … then shame on them.”

Did I miss this Sox team morph into the 1998 Yankees during the Celtics’ duck boat parade?

The Red sox entered Tuesday’s road series against the Marlins at 44-39, 1½ games out of the cubic zirconia of contention, a.k.a., the third wild card. The surging Astros, they of seven consecutive playoff appearances, were as close to the Red Sox as the Sox are to the Royals, owners of the third wild card. The playoff odds tabbed the Sox at 31.8 percent via Fangraphs and 25.6 percent according to Baseball Reference.

So, excuse me, Breslow, or anyone else who takes a wait-and-see approach with this team between now and the deadline. The priority internally remains the execution of the Sox’ plan, not expediting it.

Advertisement

To be as clear in my stance as Dwight Evans, the Sox shouldn’t automatically sit on the sidelines. If Breslow is presented with an opportunity to substantially improve the team now and beyond he should part with some of the precious prospects and pounce.

Dwight Evans - 10/15/1986
🍁 Postseason 🍁 pic.twitter.com/eOHa4sx83U

— Random Homers (@randomhomers) October 6, 2023

If there is a young starting pitcher available such as 25-year-old White Sox lefthanded strikeout artist Garrett Crochet or 26-year-old Marlins lefty Jesus Luzardo, who recently went on the injured list with a back injury and is expected to miss a month-plus, get him.

The Sox possess a surfeit of middle infield and outfield prospects with promise. The time for distillation is nigh. Prospect pools are akin to major league hitters. If you connect for a hit 3 out of 10 times, you’re doing great.

But this current Sox team hasn’t shown enough staying power to warrant wasting prospect bullets on rentals.

Sox starters posted a 5.02 ERA in June, ranking 25th, and that number has increased each month. The Sox led MLB in starters ERA in April (2.07). In May, it spiked to 4.49, also 25th.

Despite any misspoken promises, this was always another placeholder season. Breslow mentioned that he contracted a company to do an audit of the organization.

Related: Slipping starters, Rafael Devers need to provide Red Sox more in the second half

Well, the whole season feels like one giant audit. The cerebral Breslow is in full information intake mode. He’ll formulate his plan to move forward with input — i.e., financial parameters — from ownership.

For the go-for-it crowd here’s a tale from last season.

The Angels decided to go all-in and upgrade their “contending” team. They traded two top-three prospects for White Sox pitchers Reynaldo Lopez and Lucas Giolito, who was signed by the Red Sox but is out for this season after undergoing an internal brace procedure to repair a torn ulnar collateral ligament.

Advertisement

The Angels opened August with a seven-game losing streak, Shohei Ohtani tore his UCL on Aug. 23, and the Angels ended up 73-89.

This Sox team must display more to move the needle and move the organization’s decision-makers. Until then, this is just more of the same.

Christopher L. Gasper is a Globe columnist. He can be reached at christopher.gasper@globe.com. Follow him @cgasper and on Instagram @cgaspersports.

As the Red Sox consider the trade deadline, they must not ignore recent history - The Boston Globe (2025)

FAQs

Who did Red Sox get at trade deadline? ›

The Red Sox addressed their most pressing need -- bullpen help -- by acquiring right-handed reliever Lucas Sims from the Cincinnati Reds. They shipped minor-league right-hander Ovis Portes to Cincinnati in the deal.

When did the Boston Americans change to the Red Sox? ›

The oldest of all current major league ballparks, Fenway is known for its quirky features, the most famous of which is the 37-foot 2-inch (11.3-metre) left field wall known as the “Green Monster.” The team officially took the name Boston Red Sox (“BoSox” or “Sox” for short) in 1908, adapting it from the Boston Red ...

Why is it Boston Red Sox and not Red Socks? ›

The "Red Sox" name was chosen by the team owner, John I. Taylor, c. 1908, following the lead of previous teams that had been known as the "Boston Red Stockings", including the Boston Braves (now the Atlanta Braves).

When was the Red Sox trade deadline in 2004? ›

Part 2: An eventful trade deadline on July 31, 2004. The Red Sox played through the 2004 season with plenty of talent across the roster. Stars such as Johnny Damon, Manny Ramirez and David Ortiz anchored the lineup.

Who did the Red Sox trade Babe Ruth to? ›

This is the day, 104 years ago, it was announced that Harry Frazee, the owner of the Boston Red Sox, had sold Babe Ruth to the New York Yankees. There are a lot of points of light in baseball history. Never one brighter than this.

When was the baseball trade deadline? ›

The July 30 MLB trade deadline is less than a month away. Here's what you need to know. The Rangers' trade of Michael Lorenzen might be a sign that they're open for business.

Are the Red Sox change their name? ›

But at home, the Red Sox would have white uniforms with bright red stockings. And Taylor came up with the name “Red Sox,” which took hold in 1908 and has remained ever since. There was great excitement for the change in uniform design and team name.

What were the Red Sox originally called? ›

The Red Stockings joined the National Association of Professional Baseball Players and subsequently joined the National League in 1876. The Red Stockings became known as the Beaneaters in the 1880s and were still widely known by that name in 1901 when the new American League formed a competing Boston franchise.

Why do the Red Sox not have names on their jerseys? ›

"Owner Frank McCourt, Jr. has said the decision was prompted by a desire to stress a team approach and not focus on the individual." How quaint!

Why do Red Sox have 21? ›

Sept. 15 is “Roberto Clemente Day” throughout Major League Baseball, honoring the 15-time All-Star's legacy. As part of the tribute, certain players and coaches can wear No. 21 instead of their usual uniform numbers.

Which team is older, Red Sox or White Sox? ›

Chicago's American League club adopted White Sox as its official team name in 1903. Boston, after flirting with names like the Beaneaters, the Plymouth Rocks, and the Americans, officially became the Red Sox in 1908.

Why is Red Sox yellow? ›

Why are the Sox jerseys yellow? The Red Sox are wearing their City Connect uniforms, a special alternate jersey designed by Nike. The uniforms feature a yellow and blue color scheme to honor the Boston Marathon, and are inspired by the marathon's branding.

Who did Boston Red Sox trade? ›

Boston Red Sox optioned RHP Chase Shugart to Worcester Red Sox. Boston Red Sox sent 2B Jamie Westbrook outright to Worcester Red Sox.

When was Babe Ruth with the Red Sox? ›

Boston Red Sox: 1915–19

Playing for the Red Sox, Ruth soon became the best left-handed pitcher in baseball. Between 1915 and 1919 he won 87 games, yielded an earned run average of only 2.16, and won three World Series games (one in 1916 and two in 1918).

When did the Red Sox curse start? ›

The Curse of the Bambino was a superstitious sports curse in Major League Baseball (MLB) derived from the 86-year championship drought of the Boston Red Sox between 1918 and 2004.

Who did the Red Sox trade Garciaparra for? ›

July 31, 2004

As part of a 4-team trade: The Boston Red Sox sent Nomar Garciaparra and Matt Murton to the Chicago Cubs. The Minnesota Twins sent Doug Mientkiewicz to the Boston Red Sox. The Montreal Expos sent Orlando Cabrera to the Boston Red Sox.

Who did the Yankees acquire at the trade deadline? ›

The best player who was traded turned out to be Tampa Bay Rays third baseman Isaac Paredes, who went to a surprising team in the Chicago Cubs. The New York Yankees added three new players ahead of the deadline: Jazz Chisholm Jr., Mark Leiter Jr. and Enyel De Los Santos.

Who did the Astros get before the trade deadline? ›

The Houston Astros, a team in contention for an eighth consecutive American League Championship Series but plagued with starting pitching injuries, picked up 33-year-old Yusei Kikuchi from the Toronto Blue Jays in a deal made down to the wire of the MLB trade deadline.

Who did the Giants trade at the deadline? ›

The Giants made a handful of moves at the MLB trade deadline, but none of them were exactly seismic transactions. San Francisco dealing designated hitter Jorge Soler and relief pitcher Luke Jackson to the Atlanta Braves on Monday night perhaps was the biggest move president of baseball operations Farhan Zaidi and Co.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Recommended Articles
Article information

Author: Duncan Muller

Last Updated:

Views: 6234

Rating: 4.9 / 5 (79 voted)

Reviews: 94% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Duncan Muller

Birthday: 1997-01-13

Address: Apt. 505 914 Phillip Crossroad, O'Konborough, NV 62411

Phone: +8555305800947

Job: Construction Agent

Hobby: Shopping, Table tennis, Snowboarding, Rafting, Motor sports, Homebrewing, Taxidermy

Introduction: My name is Duncan Muller, I am a enchanting, good, gentle, modern, tasty, nice, elegant person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.